Brand Positioning Radar Charts

Session 3 Deliverable · Ameesha Munjal · Vanderbilt Owen MBA · March 16, 2026

Chart 1 — Competitive Positioning
RealSkin vs. key market players across five strategic dimensions. The further from center, the stronger the capability. RealSkin's shape fills the intersection no one else owns.
Platforms
RealSkin
Reddit / SkincareAddiction
Sephora Reviews
TikTok / YouTube
Curology
Axes
Skin Match Intelligence
Community Trust
Derm Credibility
Personalization
Accessibility
The white space: RealSkin is the only platform scoring above 80 on all five axes simultaneously. Everyone else is lopsided. That gap is the moat.
Chart 2 — Brand "-ity" Strength
RealSkin's six core brand values scored at V1 launch vs. V3 target. Shows where the brand is strongest on day one and what future versions must close.
Version
V1 Launch — Now
V3 Target — Full build
The Six -itys
Authenticity — 95
Specificity — 90
Clarity — 85
Community — 70
Credibility — 65
Certainty — 75
V1 gap: Credibility and Community are weakest at launch — both scale with users and derm network. Expected, not a risk. V2/V3 closes both.
Chart 3 — User Need vs. Market Supply
What RealSkin's target user actually needs vs. what the current market delivers. The gap between the two shapes is the opportunity.
Reading the Gap
What users need
What market delivers
Dimensions
Skin-Relevant Reviews
Unbiased Recommendations
Clinical Backing
Peer Community
Routine Guidance
Price Transparency
The opportunity: Market delivers on community and price. Fails hardest on skin-relevant reviews, unbiased recommendations, and clinical backing. That's exactly where RealSkin plays.